拾乐园 Paradise Found  
#1【小说翻译 】   哎,和谈该读读这篇!             Go Back

新年的礼物。请接受!

trump 这一年做到的,奥巴马八年也没有做到!

多读。觉得你读得太少,太偏。你(和那些与你的观点相似的 )的思想被束缚,有些问题你感觉不到!不能算智者。

学会独立思考!


https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/opinion/sunday/war-trump-islamic-state.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
音乐啊,音乐!
        

#2  哎,和谈该读读这篇!             Go Back
.
SundayReview | Op-Ed Columnist
A War Trump Won
[Ross Douthat]

Ross Douthat DEC. 16, 2017
Photo
American forces, accompanied by Kurdish fighters, in northern Syria near the Turkish border in April. Credit Delil Souleiman/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

There is nothing more characteristic of the Trump era, with its fire hose of misinformation, scandal and hyperbole, than that America and its allies recently managed to win a war that just two years ago consumed headlines and dominated political debate and helped Donald Trump himself get elected president — and somehow nobody seemed to notice.

I mean the war against the Islamic State, whose expansion was the defining foreign policy calamity of Barack Obama’s second term, whose executions of Americans made the U.S.A. look impotent and whose utopian experiment drew volunteers drunk on world-historical ambitions and metaphysical dreams. Its defeat was begun under Obama, and the hardest fighting has been done by Iraqis — but this was an American war too, and we succeeded without massive infusions of ground troops, without accidentally getting into a war with Russia, and without inspiring a huge wave of terrorism in the West.

Why haven’t we noticed this success? One reason is the nature of our victory: As Max Abrahms and John Glaser wrote recently in the Los Angeles Times, the defeat of the Islamic State didn’t happen the way many foreign policy hawks envisioned, because it didn’t require also going to war with Bashar al-Assad or creating a new Syrian opposition army. At the same time, it happened more easily than intervention skeptics feared — so there isn’t a pundit chorus, right or left, ready to claim vindication in the victory.

Other reasons for the lack of attention are suggested by National Review’s David French, in a piece that helped inspire this one: a war-weary assumption that if you crush one terrorist group another just springs up (true to a point, but crushing an ambitious terrorist state is still a real achievement); a popular appetite for bad news that leaves little room for celebrating victory; and the inability of Trump himself to take credit for anything without immediately firing up some unrelated controversy.

But this is also a press failure, a case where the media is not adequately reporting an important success because it does not fit into the narrative of Trumpian disaster in which our journalistic entities are all invested.

The press also ignored the starting of a steady march of coalition forces that was started by Obama. Much vetting was needed to find...
ARP December 17, 2017

I echo other writers: Trump simply stayed out of the way and let the existing strategy play out with respect to ISIS. For someone who's...
JAM December 17, 2017

It takes some courage for Ross Douthat to praise Trump for anything in the NYT. I just hope that your job is secure. Thanks, Ross for...

See All Comments

I include myself in this indictment. Foreign policy is the place where the risks of electing Trump seemed to me particularly unacceptable, and I’ve tended to focus on narratives that fit that fear, from the risk of regional war in Middle East to the perils in our North Korean brinksmanship.
Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter

Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.

See Sample Privacy Policy Opt out or contact us anytime

Those fears are still reasonable. But all punditry is provisional, and for now, the Trump administration’s approach to the Middle East has been moderately successful, and indeed close to what I would have hoped for from a normal Republican president following a realist-internationalist course.

In particular, Trump has avoided the temptation often afflicting Republican uber-hawks, in which we’re supposed to fight all bad actors on 16 fronts at once. Instead he’s slow-walked his hawkish instincts on Iran, tolerated Assad and avoided dialing up tensions with Russia. The last issue is of course entangled with the great collusion debate — but it’s still a good thing that our mini-cold war has remained relatively cool and we aren’t strafing each other over Syria.

The Saudi war in Yemen remains a humanitarian catastrophe and our relationship with the House of Saud remains corrupt. But the war in Yemen was already an American-abetted disaster under Obama, and the Trump White House has at least called for Riyadh to lift its Yemen embargo and seen the new king promise some mild social and economic reforms.

And the Trump strategy on Israel and the Palestinians, the butt of many Jared Kushner jokes, seems … not crazy? The relatively mild reaction to recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital may be a case study in expert consensus falling behind the facts; the Arab world has different concerns than it did in 1995, and Trump’s move has helped clarify that change.

Likewise, getting the Saudis to lean hard on the Palestinians, to float radical ideas for a supersized Gaza and a very Israel-friendly solution elsewhere, is as plausible an attempt to break the logjam as was the pressure Obama put on Israel. The truth is that the specific two-state vision of the late 1990s was overtaken by events a while ago, and demonstrating that some Arab states are more amenable to accommodating Israel is a useful step toward diplomatic clarity.

The rule with this White House is that if you write in praise of anything it has done, something disastrous swiftly follows. So if this column conjures up a Saudi invasion of Lebanon, a renewed intifada, or something terrible in the Koreas — well, I apologize in advance.

But if you had told me in late 2016 that almost a year into the Trump era the caliphate would be all-but-beaten without something far worse happening in the Middle East, I would have been surprised and gratified. So very provisionally, credit belongs where it’s due — to our soldiers and diplomats, yes, but to our president as well.

I invite you to follow me on Twitter (@DouthatNYT).
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
音乐啊,音乐!
        

#3  哎,和谈该读读这篇!             Go Back

先查查谁是 Ross Douthat。

take care of yourself, don't wait others to do it for you, unless you are unable!
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
音乐啊,音乐!
        



相关话题
BBB: 阿尔佛雷德·爱因斯坦论莫扎特的歌剧 01/19/18
BBB: 理查·斯特劳斯:《四首最后的歌》 01/18/18
BBB: 十九世纪早期的意大利美声歌剧(罗西尼,贝利尼,多尼采蒂) 01/14/18
BBB: 西贝柳斯的交响曲和管弦乐 01/05/18
Smithd60: John 01/05/18
reader86: 哎,和谈该读读这篇! 01/01/18
BBB: 王羽佳迈阿密音乐会 12/21/17
BBB: Katy Perry2017巡回演唱会,坦帕音乐会 12/21/17
BBB: 2017年十一月东京音乐会 12/09/17
Smithd721: John 11/19/17
章凝: 千古流芳一大公 10/21/17
BBB: 106 All-Stars: Opening Gala Concert – Jaap van Zweden Conducts Mahler 5 10/10/17
BBB: 马勒第五交响曲 10/08/17
BBB: 梵志登指挥纽约爱乐乐团演奏马勒第五交响曲 10/07/17
namdog: 纽约的川菜馆 09/27/17
章凝: 英雄的终曲 09/08/17
BBB: 佛罗里达的交响乐团和歌剧院 09/03/17
BBB: 今年三月的纽约音乐会和歌剧《费德里奥》《伊多梅纽斯》《茶花女》 09/02/17
thesunlover: 贝多芬的天鹅之歌《第16弦乐四重奏》》(Op.135) 08/17/17
lyz23: Beethoven Symphony No. 9 08/09/17